The Short List
by DAN HOTCHKISS
Sometimes its the simple ideas that are the most useful. As I return,
part-time, to parish ministry, I am struck anew by the way multiple priorities,
distractions, interruptions, and alternative perspectives cloud my view each day. It is
part of the job, of course, to be "accessible," which is to say, open to
interruptions but over months and years it is important to maintain sufficient
focus to be able, at the end, to say, "This is what we did."
The Short List is a concept I use to keep myself on track. The basic idea is that no
one can keep in mind more than three or four major priorities at once. The larger the
group, the more important it is to keep the list short. Most of us know, in preaching,
that the old three-point sermon is dull, trite and more effective than most of the
alternatives. This is because it does not tax the congregations memory. Here are
some other areas of ministry where I have found the concept of the Short List useful:
Goal setting
It is hard for any group to say no. Unitarian Universalists, like good church people
everywhere, hate especially to say no. Consequently when we sit down to set goals, we like
to collect everyones ideas and "affirm" them all. The result is a laundry
list. Since we lack an automatic washer-dryer for church programs, this kind of
goal-setting process leaves the organization to select its goals according to the tastes
and inclinations of those doing the work. Generally this means business as usual, a
congregation that resembles an ameba possibly a healthy organism, but without a
cutting edge.
A better approach is to burden the goal-setting body with a Short List of its own, for
instance: 1) We will select no more than three specific, concrete goals for the coming
year. 2) The selection of a goal shall not mean that other priorities are unimportant or
may not be achieved this year. 3) But we will achieve the goals we do select, come hell or
high water. A goal-setting body that adopts this discipline will set its congregation up
to succeed, and just as important, to know that it has succeeded.
Staff supervision
The same approach works well with staff. With a church secretary, for example, it may
make sense to sit down late in the spring to make a Short List for the coming year. From
my file, I find a short list with a secretary years ago that looks like this: 1) Get the
newsletter in the mail on schedule every week. 2) Go home promptly on time almost every
day. 3) Apply firm, consistent discipline to train the minister to turn materials in on
time. It was a wonderful year!
Ministerial evaluation
The same approach works with professional staff, including the minister. I have found
it difficult, most of the time, to get the board to sit down and create goals with me in
advance. The great thing about the Short List is that it can be applied unilaterally! I
simply let everyone know that this is how I work, announce my Short List over and over,
and invite feedback.
In Canton, Mass., for example, where Im doing a four-month, part-time interim
ministry, my Short List goes like this: 1) I will provide consistent, high-quality Sunday
worship, 2) I will be faithful in pastoral care, 3) I will contribute to morale among the
staff and top lay leadership. Did they give me this? Of course not I gave it to
them at my first interview, and they helped me to refine it.
In a longer ministry, it is important to connect the Short List to ministerial
evaluation. Ideally the board would buy in to the Short List at the beginning of the year,
and the evaluation would essentially relate to whether the list had been achieved.
Secondary items (e.g., whether the minister is a good or a bad person) are relegated to
their proper, secondary place in the evaluation.
Giving campaigns
Terry Sweetser has sparked a revival of giving in Unitarian Universalist congregations.
His workshops and videos return again and again to the central importance of two things:
1) articulating a vision and 2) asking for money. The vision for a giving campaign
is a Short List of what would happen if the campaign succeeds. The emphasis for the vision
is on new, different, sexy items: include the new piano for the sanctuary, skip the
replacement of the footings for the furnace room. We worry a great deal, typically, about
what is left out of the vision, and end up throwing in false items things wed
like to do, but do not really plan to do. Better to have a short, credible list of things
that will visibly and promptly happen if the campaign meets its goal.
Asking for money is by far the most important factor in fund raising, and it is the
shortest list of all. It is a list of how much money you are asking members and friends to
give this year. The First UU Church of Columbus, with which Im working this year on
their annual canvass, is asking for 1) a $1200 pledge, or 2) a $400 increase from last
years pledge. Weve scrapped the old income-and-percentage chart that made the
"ask" look like IRS Schedules X, Y, and Z. Instead weve given people a
Short List, something they can focus on and say yes or no to.
1) Goal setting, 2) Staff supervision, 3) Ministerial evaluation, 4) Giving campaigns.
Id better quit before the list gets any longer! |